![]() ![]() more or less) in British and American English. For example, you can use the two freely accessible British National Corpus ( ) and Corpus of Contemporary American English ( ) to analyse how a word or chunk might be used differently (e.g. ![]() The field of corpus linguistics uses such databases (or ‘corpora’) to analyse language systematically. The idea of using a large language database to extract information is not new. This way, Google can serve as an incredibly useful tool to help us in our (academic) writing. For example, if we are not sure if the correct form is ‘looking forward to seeing you’ or ‘looking forward to see you’, Google will tell us it might be better to use the first (148,000,000 versus 15,800,000 results). the more often our chunk is found on the Internet), the more ‘accepted’ it apparently is. The idea behind this approach is simple: The more results Google gives us (i.e. In Hindawi’s use case, the API is used for structural checks, and it runs behind a Writefull-owned webpage offering a user interface.Have you ever done a Google search to check if your writing is correct? Many of us do it all the time – especially when writing in our second language. Its output can be used for different purposes, such as to cross-check and validate manuscripts or to auto-populate systems. The Metadata API automatically extracts key fields and information from (batches of) manuscripts. Our goal through this extended partnership is to further support the researchers who submit to our 240+ journals by reducing the time and effort needed to submit a well-structured manuscript (that editors will be able to easily evaluate) and increasing the chances of their work quickly getting out to peer review." "Being the first publisher to integrate Writefull into our submission workflow has greatly enhanced the user experience for many of our authors by helping them to easily check and improve the quality and structure of the language in their paper. Mathias Astell, Chief Journal Development Officer at Hindawi: This is also beneficial to the publisher, who saves a considerable amount of time checking all requirements. Authors can ensure that their manuscript meets the requirements to be handled by an editor, reducing the chances of immediate rejection, and helping to speed up the screening process after submission. Like the language revision, the structural checks report helps both the author and the publisher. Authors can download the language revision in Track Changes, and the structural check as a document with details on the requirements to meet before submission. When they accept, they continue to Writefull’s page, where they can upload their manuscript and see the results of both checks (see the image below). ![]() For example, it checks whether all authors have affiliations, key sections are present, and all references are cited in the text.Īuthors submitting to Hindawi’s journals are now invited to use Writefull’s structural checks together with its language check. The Structural Checks service uses Writefull’s Metadata API to assess the completeness of a manuscript. In addition to the Writefull Revise language check that was already in place, Hindawi now offers authors structural checks on their manuscripts. We are happy to announce that Writefull has extended its pre-submission services for open access publisher Hindawi. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |